Beechmont vs Flying Fox: true annual running costs compared (2026)
Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks
Beechmont and Flying Fox are both Scenic Rim Regional Council suburbs, sitting 24.5 km and 21.6 km from Beaudesert CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.
Flying Fox runs $630 a year cheaper than Beechmont, driven mostly by the commute. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $7,222.
Over 10 years these two cost about the same to run. The difference here isn't money — it's location, schools and lifestyle.
Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →Beechmont
Flying Fox
Annual cost breakdown
| Category | Beechmont | Flying Fox | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council rates | $1,376 | $1,376 | - |
| Water & sewerage | $1,900 | $1,900 | - |
| Commute (driving) | $5,940 | $5,510 | +$430 |
| Commute (public transport) | $192 | $192 | - |
| Home insurance | $3,400 | $3,200 | +$200 |
| Body corporate (unit) | $1,800 | $1,500 | +$300 |
| Total (driving) | $12,616 | $11,986 | +$630 |
| Total (public transport) | $6,868 | $6,668 | +$200 |
Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).
| Dwelling | Beechmont | Flying Fox | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | $2,135 | $2,135 | - |
| Unit | $1,776 | $1,776 | - |
Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.
Cost breakdown chart
Annual cost breakdown — Beechmont vs Flying Fox (2026-27)
What the numbers show
Flying Fox costs $630 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $7,222 in favour of Flying Fox.
The biggest single gap is commute costs at $430 per year. Beechmont is 24.5 km from Beaudesert CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 91c/km.
On public transport the gap is $200 per year, $6,868 from Beechmont versus $6,668 from Flying Fox.
Where the difference actually comes from
- Council rates is identical at $1,376 a year.
- Water and sewerage is identical at $1,900 a year.
- Driving commute favours Flying Fox by $430 a year, $5,510 against $5,940.
- Building insurance favours Flying Fox by $200 a year, $3,200 against $3,400.
Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.
10-year cumulative cost projection
| Year | Beechmont cumulative | Flying Fox cumulative | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $12,616 | $11,986 | $630 |
| Year 3 | $38,995 | $37,048 | $1,947 |
| Year 5 | $66,980 | $63,635 | $3,345 |
| Year 10 | $144,628 | $137,406 | $7,222 |
Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is Beechmont or Flying Fox cheaper to live in?
Flying Fox is cheaper to run by car at $11,986 per year versus $12,616 for Beechmont, a difference of $630 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.
What are council rates in Beechmont and Flying Fox?
Annual council rates for a house are $1,376 in Beechmont (Scenic Rim Regional Council) and $1,376 in Flying Fox (Scenic Rim Regional Council). Water and sewerage adds $1,900 in Beechmont and $1,900 in Flying Fox. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.
How does the commute cost compare between Beechmont and Flying Fox?
Annual driving commute costs are $5,940 from Beechmont and $5,510 from Flying Fox to Beaudesert CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Beechmont and $192 from Flying Fox.
What is the 10-year cost difference between Beechmont and Flying Fox?
At 3% annual cost growth, Beechmont costs a cumulative $144,628 and Flying Fox costs $137,406 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $7,222 in favour of Flying Fox. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Which of Beechmont and Flying Fox is best to actually live in?
You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.
Related comparisons
Sources: Scenic Rim Regional Council and Scenic Rim Regional Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.