Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Blog Suburbs

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water & commute: 2025-26 · Sources: council websites, QUU, ATO, ABS

Calvert vs Lanefield: true annual running costs compared (2026)

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 88c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Calvert and Lanefield are both Ipswich City Council suburbs, sitting 55.5 km and 51 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Calvert is the cheaper suburb to live in

Calvert runs $803 a year cheaper than Lanefield, driven mostly by the commute. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $9,206.

$803difference per year
$9,206over 10 years
the commutebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years, Calvert costs about $9,200 less to run than Lanefield — the same as paying $9,200 less for the home. It's the cost no listing shows you.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →

Calvert

4340 · Ipswich City Council · 55.5 km from CBD
$11,642
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$6,090
School score4.4/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Lanefield

4340 · Ipswich City Council · 51 km from CBD
$12,445
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$6,390
School score4.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryCalvertLanefieldDifference
Council rates$1,298$1,298-
Water & sewerage$1,900$1,900-
Commute (driving)$5,744$6,247-$503
Commute (public transport)$192$192-
Home insurance$2,700$3,000-$300
Body corporate (unit)$1,500$1,600-$100
Total (driving)$11,642$12,445-$803
Total (public transport)$6,090$6,390-$300

Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 88c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingCalvertLanefieldDifference
House$1,976$1,976-
Unit$1,591$1,591-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2025 rates (QLD 30c/kWh, NSW 33c/kWh incl. supply charge; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown — Calvert vs Lanefield (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Calvert costs $803 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $9,206 in favour of Calvert.

The biggest single gap is commute costs at $503 per year. Calvert is 55.5 km from Brisbane CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 88c/km.

On public transport the gap is $300 per year, $6,090 from Calvert versus $6,390 from Lanefield.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearCalvert cumulativeLanefield cumulativeDifference
Year 1$11,642$12,445$803
Year 3$35,984$38,466$2,482
Year 5$61,809$66,072$4,263
Year 10$133,462$142,668$9,206

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Calvert or Lanefield cheaper to live in?

    Calvert is cheaper to run by car at $11,642 per year versus $12,445 for Lanefield, a difference of $803 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 88c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Calvert and Lanefield?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,298 in Calvert (Ipswich City Council) and $1,298 in Lanefield (Ipswich City Council). Water and sewerage adds $1,900 in Calvert and $1,900 in Lanefield. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Calvert and Lanefield?

    Annual driving commute costs are $5,744 from Calvert and $6,247 from Lanefield to Brisbane CBD (ATO 88c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Calvert and $192 from Lanefield.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Calvert and Lanefield?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Calvert costs a cumulative $133,462 and Lanefield costs $142,668 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $9,206 in favour of Calvert. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Calvert and Lanefield is best to actually live in?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Ipswich City Council and Ipswich City Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 88c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.