Concord vs Mortlake: true annual running costs compared (2026)
Last updated July 2026 · council rates current NSW schedules, ATO 91c/km, Opal & Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks
Concord and Mortlake are both Canada Bay rates (OLG suburbs, sitting 9.5 km and 10.1 km from Sydney CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.
The two sit within $159 a year of each other to run, so running cost is a minor factor here. The decision comes down to schools, risk and lifestyle, all in the free report.
Over 10 years these two cost about the same to run. The difference here isn't money — it's location, schools and lifestyle.
Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →Concord
Mortlake
Annual cost breakdown
| Category | Concord | Mortlake | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council rates | $1,268 | $1,268 | - |
| Water & sewerage | $1,548 | $1,548 | - |
| Commute (driving) | $2,925 | $3,084 | -$159 |
| Commute (public transport) | $1,920 | $2,386 | -$466 |
| Home insurance | $2,950 | $2,950 | - |
| Body corporate (unit) | $2,600 | $2,600 | - |
| Total (driving) | $8,691 | $8,850 | -$159 |
| Total (public transport) | $7,686 | $8,152 | -$466 |
Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: average residential rate (NSW, IPART-uplifted).
| Dwelling | Concord | Mortlake | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | $2,342 | $2,342 | - |
| Unit | $1,909 | $1,909 | - |
Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.
Cost breakdown chart
Annual cost breakdown — Concord vs Mortlake (2026-27)
What the numbers show
Concord and Mortlake cost within $159 of each other annually by car. Over ten years with 3% annual growth the gap reaches roughly $1,822, making running cost a minor factor in the decision.
The biggest single gap is commute costs at $159 per year. Mortlake is 10.1 km from Sydney CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 91c/km.
On public transport the gap is $466 per year, $7,686 from Concord versus $8,152 from Mortlake.
Where the difference actually comes from
- Council rates is identical at $1,268 a year.
- Water and sewerage is identical at $1,548 a year.
- Driving commute favours Concord by $159 a year, $2,925 against $3,084.
- Building insurance is identical at $2,950 a year.
Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance.
10-year cumulative cost projection
| Year | Concord cumulative | Mortlake cumulative | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $8,691 | $8,850 | $159 |
| Year 3 | $26,863 | $27,354 | $491 |
| Year 5 | $46,142 | $46,986 | $844 |
| Year 10 | $99,633 | $101,455 | $1,822 |
Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is Concord or Mortlake cheaper to live in?
Concord is cheaper to run by car at $8,691 per year versus $8,850 for Mortlake, a difference of $159 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.
What are council rates in Concord and Mortlake?
Annual council rates for a house are $1,268 in Concord (Canada Bay rates (OLG) and $1,268 in Mortlake (Canada Bay rates (OLG). Water and sewerage adds $1,548 in Concord and $1,548 in Mortlake. Both figures are the average residential rate reported to the Office of Local Government, uplifted by each council's IPART rate peg.
How does the commute cost compare between Concord and Mortlake?
Annual driving commute costs are $2,925 from Concord and $3,084 from Mortlake to Sydney CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $1,920 from Concord and $2,386 from Mortlake.
What is the 10-year cost difference between Concord and Mortlake?
At 3% annual cost growth, Concord costs a cumulative $99,633 and Mortlake costs $101,455 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $1,822 in favour of Concord. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Which of Concord and Mortlake is best to actually live in?
You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.
Related comparisons
Sources: Canada Bay rates (OLG and Canada Bay rates (OLG rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.