Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Blog Suburbs

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water & commute: 2025-26 · Sources: council websites, QUU, ATO, ABS

Coneac vs Rookhurst: true annual running costs compared (2026)

Last updated July 2026 · council rates current NSW schedules, ATO 88c/km, Opal & Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Coneac and Rookhurst are both Mid-Coast rates (OLG suburbs, sitting 228.8 km and 227.3 km from Sydney CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Rookhurst is the cheaper suburb to live in

Rookhurst runs $400 a year cheaper than Coneac, driven mostly by home insurance. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $4,586.

$400difference per year
$4,586over 10 years
home insurancebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years these two cost about the same to run. The difference here isn't money — it's location, schools and lifestyle.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →

Coneac

2422 · Mid-Coast rates (OLG · 228.8 km from CBD
$22,909
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$7,709
School score5.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Rookhurst

2422 · Mid-Coast rates (OLG · 227.3 km from CBD
$22,509
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$7,309
School score5.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryConeacRookhurstDifference
Council rates$1,609$1,609-
Water & sewerage$1,300$1,300-
Commute (driving)$17,600$17,600-
Commute (public transport)$2,400$2,400-
Home insurance$2,400$2,000+$400
Body corporate (unit)$1,500$1,500-
Total (driving)$22,909$22,509+$400
Total (public transport)$7,709$7,309+$400

Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 88c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: average residential rate (NSW, IPART-uplifted).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingConeacRookhurstDifference
House$2,148$2,148-
Unit$1,716$1,716-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2025 rates (QLD 30c/kWh, NSW 33c/kWh incl. supply charge; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown — Coneac vs Rookhurst (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Rookhurst costs $400 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $4,586 in favour of Rookhurst.

The biggest single gap is home insurance at $400 per year.

On public transport the gap is $400 per year, $7,709 from Coneac versus $7,309 from Rookhurst.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearConeac cumulativeRookhurst cumulativeDifference
Year 1$22,909$22,509$400
Year 3$70,809$69,573$1,236
Year 5$121,627$119,503$2,124
Year 10$262,626$258,040$4,586

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Coneac or Rookhurst cheaper to live in?

    Rookhurst is cheaper to run by car at $22,509 per year versus $22,909 for Coneac, a difference of $400 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 88c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Coneac and Rookhurst?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,609 in Coneac (Mid-Coast rates (OLG) and $1,609 in Rookhurst (Mid-Coast rates (OLG). Water and sewerage adds $1,300 in Coneac and $1,300 in Rookhurst. Both figures are the average residential rate reported to the Office of Local Government, uplifted by each council's IPART rate peg.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Coneac and Rookhurst?

    Annual driving commute costs are $17,600 from Coneac and $17,600 from Rookhurst to Sydney CBD (ATO 88c/km). Public transport costs $2,400 from Coneac and $2,400 from Rookhurst.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Coneac and Rookhurst?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Coneac costs a cumulative $262,626 and Rookhurst costs $258,040 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $4,586 in favour of Rookhurst. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Coneac and Rookhurst is best to actually live in?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Mid-Coast rates (OLG and Mid-Coast rates (OLG rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 88c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.