Cotswold Hills vs Cranley, true annual running costs compared 2026
Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks
Cotswold Hills and Cranley are both Toowoomba Regional Council suburbs, sitting 6.9 km and 5.7 km from Toowoomba CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.
Cranley runs $504 a year cheaper than Cotswold Hills, driven mostly by the commute. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $5,778.
Over 10 years, Cranley costs about $5,800 less to run than Cotswold Hills. That's about $11 a week.
Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan →Cotswold Hills
Cranley
Annual cost breakdown
| Category | Cotswold Hills | Cranley | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council rates Official, 2026-27 | $1,444 | $1,444 | - |
| Water & sewerage Official, 2026-27 | $2,188 | $2,188 | - |
| Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27 | $2,204 | $1,850 | +$354 |
| Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27 | $192 | $192 | - |
| Home insurance Estimated | $1,550 | $1,400 | +$150 |
| Body corporate (unit) Estimated | $2,000 | $2,000 | - |
| Total (driving) | $7,386 | $6,882 | +$504 |
| Total (public transport) | $5,374 | $5,224 | +$150 |
Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).
| Dwelling | Cotswold Hills | Cranley | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | $2,274 | $2,274 | - |
| Unit | $1,870 | $1,870 | - |
Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.
Cost breakdown chart
Annual cost breakdown, Cotswold Hills vs Cranley (2026-27)
What the numbers show
Cranley costs $504 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $5,778 in favour of Cranley.
The biggest single gap is commute costs at $354 per year. Cotswold Hills is 6.9 km from Toowoomba CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 91c/km.
On public transport the two suburbs cost almost the same, $5,374 and $5,224 a year, so the $504 driving gap nearly closes if you commute by public transport.
Where the difference actually comes from
- Council rates is identical at $1,444 a year.
- Water and sewerage is identical at $2,188 a year.
- Driving commute favours Cranley by $354 a year, $1,850 against $2,204.
- Building insurance favours Cranley by $150 a year, $1,400 against $1,550.
Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.
The catchment state school scores 4.3 in Cotswold Hills against 1.2 in Cranley, on ACARA's ICSEA percentile scaled to ten.
10-year cumulative cost projection
| Year | Cotswold Hills cumulative | Cranley cumulative | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $7,386 | $6,882 | $504 |
| Year 3 | $22,829 | $21,272 | $1,557 |
| Year 5 | $39,213 | $36,537 | $2,676 |
| Year 10 | $84,672 | $78,894 | $5,778 |
Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cotswold Hills or Cranley cheaper to live in?
Cranley is cheaper to run by car at $6,882 per year versus $7,386 for Cotswold Hills, a difference of $504 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.
What are council rates in Cotswold Hills and Cranley?
Annual council rates for a house are $1,444 in Cotswold Hills (Toowoomba Regional Council) and $1,444 in Cranley (Toowoomba Regional Council). Water and sewerage adds $2,188 in Cotswold Hills and $2,188 in Cranley. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.
How does the commute cost compare between Cotswold Hills and Cranley?
Annual driving commute costs are $2,204 from Cotswold Hills and $1,850 from Cranley to Toowoomba CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Cotswold Hills and $192 from Cranley.
What is the 10-year cost difference between Cotswold Hills and Cranley?
At 3% annual cost growth, Cotswold Hills costs a cumulative $84,672 and Cranley costs $78,894 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $5,778 in favour of Cranley. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Which of Cotswold Hills and Cranley suits you better?
You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.
Related comparisons
Sources: Toowoomba Regional Council and Toowoomba Regional Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.