Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Blog Suburbs

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water & commute: 2025-26 · Sources: council websites, QUU, ATO, ABS

Cotswold Hills vs Cranley: true annual running costs compared (2026)

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 88c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Cotswold Hills and Cranley are both Toowoomba Regional Council suburbs, sitting 6.9 km and 5.7 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Cranley is the cheaper suburb to live in

Cranley runs $542 a year cheaper than Cotswold Hills, driven mostly by the commute. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $6,214.

$542difference per year
$6,214over 10 years
the commutebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years these two cost about the same to run. The difference here isn't money — it's location, schools and lifestyle.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →

Cotswold Hills

4350 · Toowoomba Regional Council · 6.9 km from CBD
$7,663
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$5,724
School score4.3/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Cranley

4350 · Toowoomba Regional Council · 5.7 km from CBD
$7,121
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$5,524
School score1.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryCotswold HillsCranleyDifference
Council rates$1,444$1,444-
Water & sewerage$2,188$2,188-
Commute (driving)$2,131$1,789+$342
Commute (public transport)$192$192-
Home insurance$1,900$1,700+$200
Body corporate (unit)$2,000$2,000-
Total (driving)$7,663$7,121+$542
Total (public transport)$5,724$5,524+$200

Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 88c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingCotswold HillsCranleyDifference
House$2,115$2,115-
Unit$1,696$1,696-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2025 rates (QLD 30c/kWh, NSW 33c/kWh incl. supply charge; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown — Cotswold Hills vs Cranley (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Cranley costs $542 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $6,214 in favour of Cranley.

The biggest single gap is commute costs at $342 per year. Cotswold Hills is 6.9 km from Brisbane CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 88c/km.

On public transport the gap is $200 per year, $5,724 from Cotswold Hills versus $5,524 from Cranley.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearCotswold Hills cumulativeCranley cumulativeDifference
Year 1$7,663$7,121$542
Year 3$23,686$22,010$1,676
Year 5$40,684$37,806$2,878
Year 10$87,848$81,634$6,214

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Cotswold Hills or Cranley cheaper to live in?

    Cranley is cheaper to run by car at $7,121 per year versus $7,663 for Cotswold Hills, a difference of $542 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 88c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Cotswold Hills and Cranley?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,444 in Cotswold Hills (Toowoomba Regional Council) and $1,444 in Cranley (Toowoomba Regional Council). Water and sewerage adds $2,188 in Cotswold Hills and $2,188 in Cranley. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Cotswold Hills and Cranley?

    Annual driving commute costs are $2,131 from Cotswold Hills and $1,789 from Cranley to Brisbane CBD (ATO 88c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Cotswold Hills and $192 from Cranley.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Cotswold Hills and Cranley?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Cotswold Hills costs a cumulative $87,848 and Cranley costs $81,634 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $6,214 in favour of Cranley. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Cotswold Hills and Cranley is best to actually live in?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Toowoomba Regional Council and Toowoomba Regional Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 88c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.