Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Blog Suburbs

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water & commute: 2025-26 · Sources: council websites, QUU, ATO, ABS

Eastlakes vs Kingsford: true annual running costs compared (2026)

Last updated July 2026 · council rates current NSW schedules, ATO 88c/km, Opal & Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Eastlakes (Bayside rates (OLG) and Kingsford (Randwick rates (OLG) attract comparison from buyers considering suburbs across different council areas at similar distances from Sydney CBD (6.7 km and 6.2 km).

The verdict
Eastlakes is the cheaper suburb to live in

Eastlakes runs $317 a year cheaper than Kingsford, driven mostly by council rates. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $3,634.

$317difference per year
$3,634over 10 years
council ratesbiggest cost driver

Over 10 years these two cost about the same to run. The difference here isn't money — it's location, schools and lifestyle.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →

Eastlakes

2018 · Bayside rates (OLG · 6.7 km from CBD
$7,187
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$7,033
School score7.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Kingsford

2032 · Randwick rates (OLG · 6.2 km from CBD
$7,504
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$7,491
School score6.7/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryEastlakesKingsfordDifference
Council rates$1,265$1,723-$458
Water & sewerage$1,548$1,548-
Commute (driving)$2,074$1,933+$141
Commute (public transport)$1,920$1,920-
Home insurance$2,300$2,300-
Body corporate (unit)$2,600$2,600-
Total (driving)$7,187$7,504-$317
Total (public transport)$7,033$7,491-$458

Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 88c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: average residential rate (NSW, IPART-uplifted).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingEastlakesKingsfordDifference
House$2,148$2,148-
Unit$1,716$1,716-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2025 rates (QLD 30c/kWh, NSW 33c/kWh incl. supply charge; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown — Eastlakes vs Kingsford (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Eastlakes costs $317 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $3,634 in favour of Eastlakes.

The biggest single gap is council rates at $458 per year.

On public transport the gap is $458 per year, $7,033 from Eastlakes versus $7,491 from Kingsford.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearEastlakes cumulativeKingsford cumulativeDifference
Year 1$7,187$7,504$317
Year 3$22,214$23,194$980
Year 5$38,157$39,840$1,683
Year 10$82,391$86,025$3,634

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Eastlakes or Kingsford cheaper to live in?

    Eastlakes is cheaper to run by car at $7,187 per year versus $7,504 for Kingsford, a difference of $317 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 88c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Eastlakes and Kingsford?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,265 in Eastlakes (Bayside rates (OLG) and $1,723 in Kingsford (Randwick rates (OLG). Water and sewerage adds $1,548 in Eastlakes and $1,548 in Kingsford. Both figures are the average residential rate reported to the Office of Local Government, uplifted by each council's IPART rate peg.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Eastlakes and Kingsford?

    Annual driving commute costs are $2,074 from Eastlakes and $1,933 from Kingsford to Sydney CBD (ATO 88c/km). Public transport costs $1,920 from Eastlakes and $1,920 from Kingsford.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Eastlakes and Kingsford?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Eastlakes costs a cumulative $82,391 and Kingsford costs $86,025 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $3,634 in favour of Eastlakes. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Eastlakes and Kingsford is best to actually live in?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Bayside rates (OLG and Randwick rates (OLG rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 88c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.