Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Blog Suburbs

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water & commute: 2025-26 · Sources: council websites, QUU, ATO, ABS

Fig Tree Pocket vs Sherwood: true annual running costs compared (2026)

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 88c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Fig Tree Pocket and Sherwood are both Brisbane City Council suburbs, sitting 9 km and 8 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Sherwood is the cheaper suburb to live in

Sherwood runs $1,566 a year cheaper than Fig Tree Pocket, driven mostly by home insurance. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $17,953.

$1,566difference per year
$17,953over 10 years
home insurancebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years, Sherwood costs about $18,000 less to run than Fig Tree Pocket — the same as paying $18,000 less for the home. It's the cost no listing shows you.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →

Fig Tree Pocket

4069 · Brisbane City Council · 9 km from CBD
$9,278
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$6,771
School score10.0/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Sherwood

4075 · Brisbane City Council · 8 km from CBD
$7,712
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$5,471
School score9.5/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryFig Tree PocketSherwoodDifference
Council rates$1,579$1,579-
Water & sewerage$1,900$1,900-
Commute (driving)$2,699$2,433+$266
Commute (public transport)$192$192-
Home insurance$3,100$1,800+$1,300
Body corporate (unit)$3,200$3,200-
Total (driving)$9,278$7,712+$1,566
Total (public transport)$6,771$5,471+$1,300

Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 88c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingFig Tree PocketSherwoodDifference
House$1,976$1,976-
Unit$1,591$1,591-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2025 rates (QLD 30c/kWh, NSW 33c/kWh incl. supply charge; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown — Fig Tree Pocket vs Sherwood (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Sherwood costs $1,566 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $17,953 in favour of Sherwood.

The biggest single gap is home insurance at $1,300 per year. Fig Tree Pocket carries high flood risk, which pushes estimated premiums higher.

On public transport the gap is $1,300 per year, $6,771 from Fig Tree Pocket versus $5,471 from Sherwood.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearFig Tree Pocket cumulativeSherwood cumulativeDifference
Year 1$9,278$7,712$1,566
Year 3$28,677$23,837$4,840
Year 5$49,258$40,944$8,314
Year 10$106,362$88,409$17,953

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Fig Tree Pocket or Sherwood cheaper to live in?

    Sherwood is cheaper to run by car at $7,712 per year versus $9,278 for Fig Tree Pocket, a difference of $1,566 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 88c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Fig Tree Pocket and Sherwood?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,579 in Fig Tree Pocket (Brisbane City Council) and $1,579 in Sherwood (Brisbane City Council). Water and sewerage adds $1,900 in Fig Tree Pocket and $1,900 in Sherwood. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Fig Tree Pocket and Sherwood?

    Annual driving commute costs are $2,699 from Fig Tree Pocket and $2,433 from Sherwood to Brisbane CBD (ATO 88c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Fig Tree Pocket and $192 from Sherwood.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Fig Tree Pocket and Sherwood?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Fig Tree Pocket costs a cumulative $106,362 and Sherwood costs $88,409 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $17,953 in favour of Sherwood. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Fig Tree Pocket and Sherwood is best to actually live in?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Brisbane City Council and Brisbane City Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 88c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.