About Blog Suburbs

Data: 2025-26 financial year · Sources: council websites, QUU, ATO, ABS

Kelvin Grove vs Red Hill: true annual running costs compared (2026)

Kelvin Grove and Red Hill are both Brisbane City Council suburbs, sitting 2.7 km and 3 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

Kelvin Grove costs $125 less per year to run by car than Red Hill.

Kelvin Grove

4059 · Brisbane City Council · 2.7 km from CBD
$5,271
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$5,235
School score9.2/10
Flood riskMedium
Fire riskLow

Red Hill

4059 · Brisbane City Council · 3 km from CBD
$5,396
Total annual cost (driving)
Public transport total$5,335
School score10.0/10
Flood riskLow
Fire riskLow

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryKelvin GroveRed HillDifference
Council rates$1,519$1,519-
Water & sewerage$1,824$1,824-
Commute (driving)$228$253-$25
Commute (public transport)$192$192-
Home insurance$1,700$1,800-$100
Body corporate (unit)$5,500$3,800+$1,700
Total (driving)$5,271$5,396-$125
Total (public transport)$5,235$5,335-$100

Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 88c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown — Kelvin Grove vs Red Hill (2025-26)

What the numbers show

Kelvin Grove and Red Hill cost within $125 of each other annually by car. Over ten years with 3% annual growth the gap reaches roughly $1,433, making running cost a minor factor in the decision.

The biggest single gap is home insurance at $100 per year.

Public transport equalises the comparison: both suburbs pay a flat $192 annual PT fare, so the $125 driving gap narrows to $100 under PT. If you rely on public transport, the two suburbs cost almost the same to run annually.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearKelvin Grove cumulativeRed Hill cumulativeDifference
Year 1$5,271$5,396$125
Year 3$16,292$16,678$386
Year 5$27,984$28,648$664
Year 10$60,426$61,859$1,433

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Kelvin Grove or Red Hill cheaper to live in?

    Kelvin Grove is cheaper to run by car at $5,271 per year versus $5,396 for Red Hill — a difference of $125 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 88c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2025-26 data.

  2. What are council rates in Kelvin Grove and Red Hill?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,519 in Kelvin Grove (Brisbane City Council 2025-26) and $1,519 in Red Hill (Brisbane City Council 2025-26). Water and sewerage adds $1,824 in Kelvin Grove and $1,824 in Red Hill.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Kelvin Grove and Red Hill?

    Annual driving commute costs are $228 from Kelvin Grove and $253 from Red Hill to Brisbane CBD (ATO 88c/km, 220 working days). Public transport costs $192 from Kelvin Grove and $192 from Red Hill.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Kelvin Grove and Red Hill?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Kelvin Grove costs a cumulative $60,426 and Red Hill costs $61,859 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $1,433 in favour of Kelvin Grove. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Compare Kelvin Grove and Red Hill in the tool

The SuburbCost comparison tool shows the full annual cost breakdown for both suburbs side by side. Toggle between driving and public transport to see which suburb comes out ahead for your commuting pattern.

Open comparison →

Related comparisons

Sources: Brisbane City Council and Brisbane City Council rate schedules 2025-26, Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater 2025-26, ATO 88c/km, SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2025.