Marom Creek vs Tucki Tucki: true annual running costs compared (2026)
Last updated July 2026 · council rates current NSW schedules, ATO 91c/km, Opal & Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks
Marom Creek and Tucki Tucki are both Lismore rates (OLG suburbs, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.
The two sit within $0 a year of each other to run, so running cost is a minor factor here. The decision comes down to schools, risk and lifestyle, all in the free report.
Marom Creek
Tucki Tucki
Annual cost breakdown
| Category | Marom Creek | Tucki Tucki | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council rates | $1,534 | $1,534 | - |
| Water & sewerage | $1,300 | $1,300 | - |
| Commute (driving) | $18,200 | $18,200 | - |
| Commute (public transport) | $2,400 | $2,400 | - |
| Home insurance | $3,100 | $3,100 | - |
| Body corporate (unit) | $1,500 | $1,500 | - |
| Total (driving) | $24,134 | $24,134 | - |
| Total (public transport) | $8,334 | $8,334 | - |
Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: average residential rate (NSW, IPART-uplifted).
| Dwelling | Marom Creek | Tucki Tucki | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | $2,774 | $2,774 | - |
| Unit | $2,329 | $2,329 | - |
Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.
Cost breakdown chart
Annual cost breakdown — Marom Creek vs Tucki Tucki (2026-27)
What the numbers show
Marom Creek and Tucki Tucki cost within $0 of each other annually by car. Over ten years with 3% annual growth the gap reaches roughly $0, making running cost a minor factor in the decision.
The biggest single gap is council rates at $0 per year.
On public transport the two suburbs cost almost the same, $8,334 and $8,334 a year, so the $0 driving gap nearly closes if you commute by public transport.
Where the difference actually comes from
- Council rates is identical at $1,534 a year.
- Water and sewerage is identical at $1,300 a year.
- Driving commute is identical at $18,200 a year.
- Building insurance is identical at $3,100 a year.
Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. On these four costs they are identical.
10-year cumulative cost projection
| Year | Marom Creek cumulative | Tucki Tucki cumulative | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $24,134 | $24,134 | $0 |
| Year 3 | $74,596 | $74,596 | $0 |
| Year 5 | $128,131 | $128,131 | $0 |
| Year 10 | $276,669 | $276,669 | $0 |
Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is Marom Creek or Tucki Tucki cheaper to live in?
Marom Creek is cheaper to run by car at $24,134 per year versus $24,134 for Tucki Tucki, a difference of $0 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.
What are council rates in Marom Creek and Tucki Tucki?
Annual council rates for a house are $1,534 in Marom Creek (Lismore rates (OLG) and $1,534 in Tucki Tucki (Lismore rates (OLG). Water and sewerage adds $1,300 in Marom Creek and $1,300 in Tucki Tucki. Both figures are the average residential rate reported to the Office of Local Government, uplifted by each council's IPART rate peg.
How does the commute cost compare between Marom Creek and Tucki Tucki?
Marom Creek carries a flat regional driving allowance of $18,200, about 20,000 km of household driving a year, because it is more than 100 km from Sydney CBD. Tucki Tucki carries a flat regional driving allowance of $18,200, about 20,000 km of household driving a year, because it is more than 100 km from Sydney CBD. Public transport costs $2,400 from Marom Creek and $2,400 from Tucki Tucki.
What is the 10-year cost difference between Marom Creek and Tucki Tucki?
At 3% annual cost growth, Marom Creek costs a cumulative $276,669 and Tucki Tucki costs $276,669 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $0 in favour of Marom Creek. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Which of Marom Creek and Tucki Tucki is best to actually live in?
You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.
Related comparisons
Sources: Lismore rates (OLG and Lismore rates (OLG rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.