Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Data studies Suburbs For agents and brokers

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water: 2026-27 · Commute: ATO 2026-27 · Sources: council budgets, water utilities, ATO, ABS

Mount Warren Park vs Stapylton, true annual running costs compared 2026

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Mount Warren Park (Logan City Council) and Stapylton (City of Gold Coast) attract comparison from buyers considering suburbs across different council areas.

The verdict
Stapylton is the cheaper suburb to live in

Stapylton runs $648 a year cheaper than Mount Warren Park, driven mostly by council rates. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $7,429.

$648difference per year
$7,429over 10 years
council ratesbiggest cost driver

Over 10 years, Stapylton costs about $7,400 less to run than Mount Warren Park. That's about $14 a week.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan →

Mount Warren Park

4207 · Logan City Council · 34 km from CBD
$12,779
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$6,140
School score5.1/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Stapylton

4207 · City of Gold Coast · 30.6 km from CBD
$12,131
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$5,720
School score5.1/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryMount Warren ParkStapyltonDifference
Council rates Official, 2026-27$1,699$1,359+$340
Water & sewerage Official, 2026-27$2,149$2,169-$20
Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27$6,831$6,603+$228
Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27$192$192-
Home insurance Estimated$2,100$2,000+$100
Body corporate (unit) Estimated$2,200$2,000+$200
Total (driving)$12,779$12,131+$648
Total (public transport)$6,140$5,720+$420

Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingMount Warren ParkStapyltonDifference
House$2,135$2,135-
Unit$1,776$1,776-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown, Mount Warren Park vs Stapylton (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Stapylton costs $648 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $7,429 in favour of Stapylton.

The biggest single gap is council rates at $340 per year.

On public transport the gap is $420 per year, $6,140 from Mount Warren Park versus $5,720 from Stapylton.

Where the difference actually comes from

They sit in different council areas, so the rates line is set by two different councils. For QLD that figure is the minimum residential general rate for an owner-occupied principal place of residence, a floor rather than a typical bill.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearMount Warren Park cumulativeStapylton cumulativeDifference
Year 1$12,779$12,131$648
Year 3$39,499$37,496$2,003
Year 5$67,845$64,405$3,440
Year 10$146,497$139,068$7,429

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Mount Warren Park or Stapylton cheaper to live in?

    Stapylton is cheaper to run by car at $12,131 per year versus $12,779 for Mount Warren Park, a difference of $648 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Mount Warren Park and Stapylton?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,699 in Mount Warren Park (Logan City Council) and $1,359 in Stapylton (City of Gold Coast). Water and sewerage adds $2,149 in Mount Warren Park and $2,169 in Stapylton. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Mount Warren Park and Stapylton?

    Mount Warren Park is $6,831 a year to drive to Brisbane CBD (ATO 91c/km). Stapylton is $6,603 a year to drive to Gold Coast CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Mount Warren Park and $192 from Stapylton.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Mount Warren Park and Stapylton?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Mount Warren Park costs a cumulative $146,497 and Stapylton costs $139,068 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $7,429 in favour of Stapylton. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Mount Warren Park and Stapylton suits you better?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Logan City Council and City of Gold Coast rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.