Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Data studies Suburbs For agents and brokers

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water: 2026-27 · Commute: ATO 2026-27 · Sources: council budgets, water utilities, ATO, ABS

Nathan vs Robertson, true annual running costs compared 2026

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Nathan and Robertson are both Brisbane City Council suburbs, sitting 9.2 km and 11.1 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Robertson is the cheaper suburb to live in

Robertson runs $355 a year cheaper than Nathan, driven mostly by home insurance. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $4,070.

$355difference per year
$4,070over 10 years
home insurancebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years the gap between these two is about $4,100, about $8 a week, and most of it is the AI-estimated insurance line.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan → Neither quite right? Find the Brisbane suburbs that fit your budget →

Nathan

4111 · Brisbane City Council · 9.2 km from CBD
$8,245
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$5,592
School score9.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Robertson

4109 · Brisbane City Council · 11.1 km from CBD
$7,890
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$4,742
School score9.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryNathanRobertsonDifference
Council rates Official, 2026-27$950$950-
Water & sewerage Official, 2026-27$1,900$1,900-
Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27$2,845$3,340-$495
Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27$192$192-
Home insurance Estimated$2,550$1,700+$850
Body corporate (unit) Estimated$2,800$2,400+$400
Total (driving)$8,245$7,890+$355
Total (public transport)$5,592$4,742+$850

Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingNathanRobertsonDifference
House$2,135$2,135-
Unit$1,776$1,776-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown, Nathan vs Robertson (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Nathan and Robertson differ by $355 a year by car, but $850 of that is the building insurance estimate rather than a published figure. On the sourced costs, council rates, water and the commute, the gap is $495, so neither suburb is named cheaper here.

The biggest single gap is home insurance at $850 per year.

On public transport the gap is $850 per year, $5,592 from Nathan versus $4,742 from Robertson.

Where the difference actually comes from

Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.

Fire risk is rated high in Nathan against medium in Robertson, which feeds the insurance estimate.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearNathan cumulativeRobertson cumulativeDifference
Year 1$8,245$7,890$355
Year 3$25,484$24,387$1,097
Year 5$43,774$41,889$1,885
Year 10$94,520$90,450$4,070

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Nathan or Robertson cheaper to live in?

    Neither is named cheaper. Nathan runs $8,245 a year by car and Robertson $7,890, but most of the $355 difference is the building insurance estimate rather than a published figure. On council rates, water and the commute, which are sourced, the gap is $495. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Nathan and Robertson?

    Annual council rates for a house are $950 in Nathan (Brisbane City Council) and $950 in Robertson (Brisbane City Council). Water and sewerage adds $1,900 in Nathan and $1,900 in Robertson. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Nathan and Robertson?

    Annual driving commute costs are $2,845 from Nathan and $3,340 from Robertson to Brisbane CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Nathan and $192 from Robertson.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Nathan and Robertson?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Nathan costs a cumulative $94,520 and Robertson costs $90,450 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $4,070 in favour of Robertson. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Nathan and Robertson suits you better?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Brisbane City Council and Brisbane City Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.