Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Data studies Suburbs For agents and brokers

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water: 2026-27 where published, otherwise estimated · Commute: ATO 2026-27 · Sources: council budgets, water utilities, ATO, ABS

Niagara Park vs Wyoming, true annual running costs compared 2026

Last updated July 2026 · council rates current NSW schedules, ATO 91c/km, Opal & Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Niagara Park and Wyoming are both Central Coast rates (OLG suburbs, sitting 55.9 km and 53.5 km from Sydney CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Niagara Park is the cheaper suburb to live in

Niagara Park runs $608 a year cheaper than Wyoming, driven mostly by the commute. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $6,971.

$608difference per year
$6,971over 10 years
the commutebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years, Niagara Park costs about $7,000 less to run than Wyoming. That's about $13 a week.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan →

Niagara Park

2250 · Central Coast rates (OLG · 55.9 km from CBD
$10,189
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$6,704
School score6.2/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Wyoming

2250 · Central Coast rates (OLG · 53.5 km from CBD
$10,797
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$7,004
School score4.5/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryNiagara ParkWyomingDifference
Council rates Official, 2026-27$1,454$1,454-
Water & sewerage Estimated$1,300$1,300-
Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27$5,885$6,193-$308
Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27$2,400$2,400-
Home insurance Estimated$1,550$1,850-$300
Body corporate (unit) Estimated$2,100$2,100-
Total (driving)$10,189$10,797-$608
Total (public transport)$6,704$7,004-$300

Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: average residential rate (NSW, IPART-uplifted).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingNiagara ParkWyomingDifference
House$2,342$2,342-
Unit$1,909$1,909-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown, Niagara Park vs Wyoming (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Niagara Park costs $608 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $6,971 in favour of Niagara Park.

The biggest single gap is commute costs at $308 per year. Niagara Park is 55.9 km from Sydney CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 91c/km.

On public transport the gap is $300 per year, $6,704 from Niagara Park versus $7,004 from Wyoming.

Where the difference actually comes from

Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.

Flood risk is rated medium in Wyoming against low in Niagara Park, which feeds the insurance estimate. The catchment state school scores 6.2 in Niagara Park against 4.5 in Wyoming, on ACARA's ICSEA percentile scaled to ten.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearNiagara Park cumulativeWyoming cumulativeDifference
Year 1$10,189$10,797$608
Year 3$31,493$33,372$1,879
Year 5$54,095$57,323$3,228
Year 10$116,805$123,776$6,971

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Niagara Park or Wyoming cheaper to live in?

    Niagara Park is cheaper to run by car at $10,189 per year versus $10,797 for Wyoming, a difference of $608 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Niagara Park and Wyoming?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,454 in Niagara Park (Central Coast rates (OLG) and $1,454 in Wyoming (Central Coast rates (OLG). Water and sewerage adds $1,300 in Niagara Park and $1,300 in Wyoming. Both figures are the average residential rate reported to the Office of Local Government, uplifted by each council's IPART rate peg.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Niagara Park and Wyoming?

    Annual driving commute costs are $5,885 from Niagara Park and $6,193 from Wyoming to Sydney CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $2,400 from Niagara Park and $2,400 from Wyoming.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Niagara Park and Wyoming?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Niagara Park costs a cumulative $116,805 and Wyoming costs $123,776 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $6,971 in favour of Niagara Park. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Niagara Park and Wyoming suits you better?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Central Coast rates (OLG and Central Coast rates (OLG rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.