Cedar Vale vs Woodhill: true annual running costs compared (2026)
Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks
Cedar Vale and Woodhill are both Logan City Council suburbs, sitting 45.7 km and 46.7 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.
The two sit within $254 a year of each other to run, so running cost is a minor factor here. The decision comes down to schools, risk and lifestyle, all in the free report.
Over 10 years these two cost about the same to run. The difference here isn't money — it's location, schools and lifestyle.
Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict →Cedar Vale
Woodhill
Annual cost breakdown
| Category | Cedar Vale | Woodhill | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Council rates | $1,699 | $1,699 | - |
| Water & sewerage | $2,149 | $2,149 | - |
| Commute (driving) | $6,847 | $6,793 | +$54 |
| Commute (public transport) | $192 | $192 | - |
| Home insurance | $3,300 | $3,100 | +$200 |
| Body corporate (unit) | $1,600 | $1,500 | +$100 |
| Total (driving) | $13,995 | $13,741 | +$254 |
| Total (public transport) | $7,340 | $7,140 | +$200 |
Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance AI-estimated; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).
| Dwelling | Cedar Vale | Woodhill | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | $2,135 | $2,135 | - |
| Unit | $1,776 | $1,776 | - |
Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.
Cost breakdown chart
Annual cost breakdown — Cedar Vale vs Woodhill (2026-27)
What the numbers show
Cedar Vale and Woodhill cost within $254 of each other annually by car. Over ten years with 3% annual growth the gap reaches roughly $2,912, making running cost a minor factor in the decision.
The biggest single gap is home insurance at $200 per year.
On public transport the gap is $200 per year, $7,340 from Cedar Vale versus $7,140 from Woodhill.
Where the difference actually comes from
- Council rates is identical at $1,699 a year.
- Water and sewerage is identical at $2,149 a year.
- Driving commute favours Woodhill by $54 a year, $6,793 against $6,847.
- Building insurance favours Woodhill by $200 a year, $3,100 against $3,300.
Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.
10-year cumulative cost projection
| Year | Cedar Vale cumulative | Woodhill cumulative | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $13,995 | $13,741 | $254 |
| Year 3 | $43,257 | $42,472 | $785 |
| Year 5 | $74,301 | $72,953 | $1,348 |
| Year 10 | $160,437 | $157,525 | $2,912 |
Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cedar Vale or Woodhill cheaper to live in?
Woodhill is cheaper to run by car at $13,741 per year versus $13,995 for Cedar Vale, a difference of $254 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.
What are council rates in Cedar Vale and Woodhill?
Annual council rates for a house are $1,699 in Cedar Vale (Logan City Council) and $1,699 in Woodhill (Logan City Council). Water and sewerage adds $2,149 in Cedar Vale and $2,149 in Woodhill. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.
How does the commute cost compare between Cedar Vale and Woodhill?
Annual driving commute costs are $6,847 from Cedar Vale and $6,793 from Woodhill to Brisbane CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Cedar Vale and $192 from Woodhill.
What is the 10-year cost difference between Cedar Vale and Woodhill?
At 3% annual cost growth, Cedar Vale costs a cumulative $160,437 and Woodhill costs $157,525 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $2,912 in favour of Woodhill. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.
Which of Cedar Vale and Woodhill is best to actually live in?
You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.
Related comparisons
Sources: Logan City Council and Logan City Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost AI insurance estimates. Data updated July 2026.