Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Data studies Suburbs For agents and brokers

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water: 2026-27 · Commute: ATO 2026-27 · Sources: council budgets, water utilities, ATO, ABS

Lota vs Manly West, true annual running costs compared 2026

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Lota and Manly West are both Brisbane City Council suburbs, sitting 15.8 km and 14 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Manly West is the cheaper suburb to live in

Manly West runs $1,345 a year cheaper than Lota, driven mostly by home insurance. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $15,419.

$1,345difference per year
$15,419over 10 years
home insurancebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years the gap between these two is about $15,400, about $30 a week, and most of it is the AI-estimated insurance line.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan → Neither quite right? Find the Brisbane suburbs that fit your budget →

Lota

4179 · Brisbane City Council · 15.8 km from CBD
$10,581
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$6,342
School score7.5/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Manly West

4179 · Brisbane City Council · 14 km from CBD
$9,236
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$5,392
School score7.0/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryLotaManly WestDifference
Council rates Official, 2026-27$950$950-
Water & sewerage Official, 2026-27$1,900$1,900-
Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27$4,431$4,036+$395
Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27$192$192-
Home insurance Estimated$3,300$2,350+$950
Body corporate (unit) Estimated$2,800$2,600+$200
Total (driving)$10,581$9,236+$1,345
Total (public transport)$6,342$5,392+$950

Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingLotaManly WestDifference
House$2,135$2,135-
Unit$1,776$1,776-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown, Lota vs Manly West (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Lota and Manly West differ by $1,345 a year by car, but $950 of that is the building insurance estimate rather than a published figure. On the sourced costs, council rates, water and the commute, the gap is $395, so neither suburb is named cheaper here.

The biggest single gap is home insurance at $950 per year. Lota carries medium flood risk, which pushes estimated premiums higher.

On public transport the gap is $950 per year, $6,342 from Lota versus $5,392 from Manly West.

Where the difference actually comes from

Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.

Flood risk is rated medium in Lota against low in Manly West, which feeds the insurance estimate. Fire risk is rated high in Lota against medium in Manly West, which feeds the insurance estimate.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearLota cumulativeManly West cumulativeDifference
Year 1$10,581$9,236$1,345
Year 3$32,705$28,548$4,157
Year 5$56,176$49,035$7,141
Year 10$121,299$105,880$15,419

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Lota or Manly West cheaper to live in?

    Neither is named cheaper. Lota runs $10,581 a year by car and Manly West $9,236, but most of the $1,345 difference is the building insurance estimate rather than a published figure. On council rates, water and the commute, which are sourced, the gap is $395. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Lota and Manly West?

    Annual council rates for a house are $950 in Lota (Brisbane City Council) and $950 in Manly West (Brisbane City Council). Water and sewerage adds $1,900 in Lota and $1,900 in Manly West. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Lota and Manly West?

    Annual driving commute costs are $4,431 from Lota and $4,036 from Manly West to Brisbane CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Lota and $192 from Manly West.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Lota and Manly West?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Lota costs a cumulative $121,299 and Manly West costs $105,880 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $15,419 in favour of Manly West. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Lota and Manly West suits you better?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Brisbane City Council and Brisbane City Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.