Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Data studies Suburbs For agents and brokers

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water: 2026-27 · Commute: ATO 2026-27 · Sources: council budgets, water utilities, ATO, ABS

Meadowbrook vs Slacks Creek, true annual running costs compared 2026

Last updated July 2026 · council rates 2026-27 (QLD), ATO 91c/km, Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Meadowbrook and Slacks Creek are both Logan City Council suburbs, sitting 24.6 km and 21.9 km from Brisbane CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Slacks Creek is the cheaper suburb to live in

Slacks Creek runs $345 a year cheaper than Meadowbrook, driven mostly by the commute. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $3,955.

$345difference per year
$3,955over 10 years
the commutebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years, Slacks Creek costs about $4,000 less to run than Meadowbrook. That's about $8 a week.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan → Neither quite right? Find the Brisbane suburbs that fit your budget →

Meadowbrook

4131 · Logan City Council · 24.6 km from CBD
$12,001
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$6,240
School score4.5/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Slacks Creek

4127 · Logan City Council · 21.9 km from CBD
$11,656
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$6,290
School score3.1/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryMeadowbrookSlacks CreekDifference
Council rates Official, 2026-27$1,699$1,699-
Water & sewerage Official, 2026-27$2,149$2,149-
Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27$5,953$5,558+$395
Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27$192$192-
Home insurance Estimated$2,200$2,250-$50
Body corporate (unit) Estimated$2,600$2,800-$200
Total (driving)$12,001$11,656+$345
Total (public transport)$6,240$6,290-$50

Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: minimum residential general rate (QLD).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingMeadowbrookSlacks CreekDifference
House$2,135$2,135-
Unit$1,776$1,776-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown, Meadowbrook vs Slacks Creek (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Slacks Creek costs $345 less per year to run by car. Held over ten years at 3% annual cost growth, that gap compounds to $3,955 in favour of Slacks Creek.

The biggest single gap is commute costs at $395 per year. Meadowbrook is 24.6 km from Brisbane CBD, which drives higher annual driving costs at the ATO rate of 91c/km.

On public transport the two suburbs cost almost the same, $6,240 and $6,290 a year, so the $345 driving gap nearly closes if you commute by public transport.

Where the difference actually comes from

Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.

The catchment state school scores 4.5 in Meadowbrook against 3.1 in Slacks Creek, on ACARA's ICSEA percentile scaled to ten.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearMeadowbrook cumulativeSlacks Creek cumulativeDifference
Year 1$12,001$11,656$345
Year 3$37,094$36,028$1,066
Year 5$63,715$61,883$1,832
Year 10$137,578$133,623$3,955

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Meadowbrook or Slacks Creek cheaper to live in?

    Slacks Creek is cheaper to run by car at $11,656 per year versus $12,001 for Meadowbrook, a difference of $345 annually. Figures cover council rates, water, commute (ATO 91c/km), and home insurance. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Meadowbrook and Slacks Creek?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,699 in Meadowbrook (Logan City Council) and $1,699 in Slacks Creek (Logan City Council). Water and sewerage adds $2,149 in Meadowbrook and $2,149 in Slacks Creek. Both figures are the minimum residential general rate; properties on higher land value pay more.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Meadowbrook and Slacks Creek?

    Annual driving commute costs are $5,953 from Meadowbrook and $5,558 from Slacks Creek to Brisbane CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $192 from Meadowbrook and $192 from Slacks Creek.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Meadowbrook and Slacks Creek?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Meadowbrook costs a cumulative $137,578 and Slacks Creek costs $133,623 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $3,955 in favour of Slacks Creek. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Meadowbrook and Slacks Creek suits you better?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Logan City Council and Logan City Council rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.