Council rates Cost of living calculator Electricity calculator About Data studies Suburbs For agents and brokers

Council rates: 2026-27 · Water: 2026-27 · Commute: ATO 2026-27 · Sources: council budgets, water utilities, ATO, ABS

Pitt Town Bottoms vs Windsor, true annual running costs compared 2026

Last updated July 2026 · council rates current NSW schedules, ATO 91c/km, Opal & Translink fares, AER electricity benchmarks

Pitt Town Bottoms and Windsor are both Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in suburbs, sitting 46.1 km and 46.3 km from Sydney CBD respectively, and are commonly compared by buyers weighing up running costs within the same council area.

The verdict
Windsor is the cheaper suburb to live in

Windsor runs $310 a year cheaper than Pitt Town Bottoms, driven mostly by home insurance. Over 10 years at 3% growth that gap compounds to about $3,554.

$310difference per year
$3,554over 10 years
home insurancebiggest cost driver

Over 10 years the gap between these two is about $3,600, about $7 a week, and most of it is the AI-estimated insurance line.

Get the free report: 10-year costs, flood & fire risk, crime, schools and overall verdict → Personalise this comparison with your own commute, home type and loan → Neither quite right? Find the Sydney suburbs that fit your budget →

Pitt Town Bottoms

2756 · Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in · 46.1 km from CBD
$12,322
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$7,896
School score5.7/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Windsor

2756 · Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in · 46.3 km from CBD
$12,012
Total annual cost (driving)
Includes estimated insurance, excludes electricity
Public transport total$7,596
School score4.6/10
Flood & fire riskIn report

Annual cost breakdown

CategoryPitt Town BottomsWindsorDifference
Council rates Official, 2026-27$1,848$1,848-
Water & sewerage Official, 2026-27$1,548$1,548-
Commute (driving) Modelled, 2026-27$6,826$6,816+$10
Commute (public transport) Modelled, 2026-27$2,400$2,400-
Home insurance Estimated$2,100$1,800+$300
Body corporate (unit) Estimated$2,100$2,100-
Total (driving)$12,322$12,012+$310
Total (public transport)$7,896$7,596+$300

Totals exclude electricity, estimated separately below. Green = cheaper. Commute: ATO 91c/km, 220 working days. Insurance estimated from ACCC premium rates; actual premiums vary. Council rates: average residential rate (NSW, IPART-uplifted).

Estimated electricity cost typical 2-person household
DwellingPitt Town BottomsWindsorDifference
House$2,720$2,720-
Unit$2,209$2,209-

Estimated from AER residential benchmarks for each suburb's climate zone at 2026-27 regulated prices for each suburb's electricity network, including supply charge (AER Default Market Offer caps, or the QCA price in regional Queensland; unit ≈ 75% of a house). Get the free report for a breakdown by your exact number of occupants.

Cost breakdown chart

Annual cost breakdown, Pitt Town Bottoms vs Windsor (2026-27)

What the numbers show

Pitt Town Bottoms and Windsor differ by $310 a year by car, but $300 of that is the building insurance estimate rather than a published figure. On the sourced costs, council rates, water and the commute, the gap is $10, so neither suburb is named cheaper here.

The biggest single gap is home insurance at $300 per year. Pitt Town Bottoms carries high flood risk, which pushes estimated premiums higher.

On public transport the gap is $300 per year, $7,896 from Pitt Town Bottoms versus $7,596 from Windsor.

Where the difference actually comes from

Both suburbs sit in the same council area, so the rates line is identical and none of the difference between them comes from council. What separates them is commute distance and the insurance band.

The catchment state school scores 5.7 in Pitt Town Bottoms against 4.6 in Windsor, on ACARA's ICSEA percentile scaled to ten.

10-year cumulative cost projection

YearPitt Town Bottoms cumulativeWindsor cumulativeDifference
Year 1$12,322$12,012$310
Year 3$38,086$37,128$958
Year 5$65,419$63,773$1,646
Year 10$141,258$137,704$3,554

Assumes 3% annual cost growth. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Is Pitt Town Bottoms or Windsor cheaper to live in?

    Neither is named cheaper. Pitt Town Bottoms runs $12,322 a year by car and Windsor $12,012, but most of the $310 difference is the building insurance estimate rather than a published figure. On council rates, water and the commute, which are sourced, the gap is $10. Source: SuburbCost 2026 data.

  2. What are council rates in Pitt Town Bottoms and Windsor?

    Annual council rates for a house are $1,848 in Pitt Town Bottoms (Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in) and $1,848 in Windsor (Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in). Water and sewerage adds $1,548 in Pitt Town Bottoms and $1,548 in Windsor. Both figures are the average residential rate reported to the Office of Local Government, uplifted by each council's IPART rate peg.

  3. How does the commute cost compare between Pitt Town Bottoms and Windsor?

    Annual driving commute costs are $6,826 from Pitt Town Bottoms and $6,816 from Windsor to Sydney CBD (ATO 91c/km). Public transport costs $2,400 from Pitt Town Bottoms and $2,400 from Windsor.

  4. What is the 10-year cost difference between Pitt Town Bottoms and Windsor?

    At 3% annual cost growth, Pitt Town Bottoms costs a cumulative $141,258 and Windsor costs $137,704 over 10 years by car. The cumulative difference is $3,554 in favour of Windsor. Excludes purchase price, mortgage, and personal expenses.

Which of Pitt Town Bottoms and Windsor suits you better?

You've got the costs. Get the free personalised report for the rest: a clear verdict on which suburb wins, the full flood, fire and crime risk profile, nearest schools, estimated electricity cost by number of occupants, and your own loan or rent stress-tested over 10 years. No spam.

Free · no spam · built from official council, ATO & ACARA data

Related comparisons

Sources: Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in and Hawkesbury City Council rates (IPART approved SRV, 8.66% in rate data, water utility pricing (QLD: Queensland Urban Utilities / Unitywater; NSW: Sydney Water / Hunter Water), ATO 91c/km, and SuburbCost insurance estimates from ACCC premium rates. Data updated July 2026.